- Ajit Doval, KC - Former Director, VIF
Salafi Terrorism-The Eminent Threat
Most of the Islamic terrorism that the world is experiencing today- in the West, Arab countries, South Asia or South East Asia- is the Salafi variety of Jehad. Salafism represents a Sunni Islamic School of thought that is credited to an eighteenth century ideologue of Saudi Arabia named Muhammad Ibn Abd-al-Wahhab. It was later refined and perfected by Scholars of al-Azhar University in Egypt, notable among them being Muhammad Abduh Jamal-al-Din-al-Afghani and Rashid Rida. Salafis insist on reverting to the conduct followed by pious ancestors (Salaf) of the early period of Islam. They believe Islam was perfect and flawless during the days of Prophet Muhammad but undesirable innovations and impurities crept over the period of time. They all had to be identified and discarded. The School is thus opposed to any change and innovations and highly inflexible and orthodox in its approach.
Though its original home was Middle East and it largely remained confined there for many decades. Of late, its spatial growth in Sunni dominated areas all around the world has been notable. For rootless immigrants and disaffected second-generation youth in Europe, the attraction of the authentic Salafism as a way to differentiate from others-as it is seen to be pure and stripped of the local superstitions, conferring a status of moral superiority.21 One of the main political objectives of the Salafis is establishment of Islamic caliphate which could establish the sovereignty of Allah. The concept of caliphate is totally rejected by the Shias-Shia ideologues have their own interpretations of ideal Islamic world order, which create a different variety of radicalism and poses a different genre of conflicts with its own implications. The present day threat predominantly emanates from Sunni-extremism. Sunnis constitute over 80% of the world Muslim population, have widely dispersed global spread and exclusively contribute to the Salafi ranks, who believe in Islamic universality, allowing no local diversions.
Sunni revivalists of the caliphate idea include Hizb-ut-Tahir, a major radical Pan Islamic outfit which has its presence in over 45 countries. In Central Asia they stand for establishment of an Islamic state from Black sea to Xinziang in China. Similarly, an idea of a united Islamic state in South East Asia comprising of Indonesia, Malaysia, Southern Thailand, Parts of Philippines and other adjoining areas is envisaged. Similar vision is harbored for South Asian countries and many other parts of the world. All these new gains, through Jehad, integrated with Islamic world are envisaged to be part of the Islamic caliphate. It may be mentioned that during prophet Mohammad’s time, Arabia had no state and the Quran does not speak of any Islamic state as such. The notion of caliphate is of much later origin and came into existence only after the death of Prophet Mohammed. Salafis stretch the concept of Islamic Umma to mean a united Islamic Sovereign political entity rather than unity of Islamic people that it meant. Political consolidation, they consider is necessary for enforcing the divine laws of Quran the examples of Prophet (Shria), Islamic laws (fiqh) etc. Their conflict with notions of modernity likes democracy, Secularism, equality before law, human rights etc, is fundamental and irreconcilable. They consider that egalitarianism of Islam provides sufficient space to meet all human needs – both physical and spiritual.
The spread of Salafi philosophy has given a quantum jump to Islamic radicalism and concomitant terrorism. It has provided a new breed of radicals and foot soldiers for Jehad with a fire power and geographical expanse never known to any religion, including Islam, in history. The role of ideology in Salafi-Jehadi terror is multi-functional and intertwined to social and political processes. For a Salafi Jehadi the strategic objective is not only creating liberated Shari’a zones but perpetration of Jehad itself and attainment of martyrdom. The ideology both expresses and reinforces a culture of self martyrdom as a strategic good in itself giving rise to phenomenon like suicide terrorism. Salafis consider themselves as Al Taifa-al Mansoura (the victorious group) who alone would be saved at the end of time. They are critical of moderate Salafis who only believe in it ideologically but are unwilling to participate in Jehad, and label them as Margi’eb (prevaricators). This fraternity reaches its apogee in combat and revolves around the common pursuit of martyrdom.16 The promise of brotherhood and its associated group is essential component of the recruitment process, especially for Jehadis in the West.17 In its most extreme form, Salafi “parallelism” can be found in the concept of ‘takfiri’, separation from all elements of society outside their cells. In this concept exclusion both of Muslims and non-Muslims is legitimate and not apostate. This permits the targeting of everyone outside the group, Muslims and non-Muslims for violence.18 The Salafi terrorist ideology creates an obligation for physical Jehad as Bin Laden wrote “the most important religious duty –after belief itself- is to ward off and fight the enemy. Jehad is obligatory now for the Islamic nation, which is in a state of sin unless it gives its sons to maintain Jehad.19.
Spatial Growth And Expanse
The above dialectic of Islamic terrorism renders a geographical theatre analysis meaningless. For them, the whole world is a single entity where Nizam-e-Mustafa (the Sovereignty of Allah) has to be established. Briefly, a geographical analysis has to be understood factoring in the following constraining factors:
- At ideological plane, the Jehadis consider the areas, where the sovereignty of Allah does not exist as Dar-ul-Harb. Here wars have to be fought to convert or kill to establish Islam. In the Islamic regimes, wars have to be fought to enforce the laws laid down by Quran, Shari’a, etc. This practically extends their arch of action to the entire world.
- Emergence of International Islamic Front for Jehad under the over-arching leadership of Osama Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda has brought in ideological unity and global networking among Islamic extremist of various hues. The call of global Jehad cutting across nationalities, ethnicity, language culture etc., renders boundaries of nation states meaning- less. It has converted Al Qaeda from a terrorist outfit to an Islamic movement with no formal structure and centralized control but as a global motivator for terror and violence;
- Modern technology and revolution in informatics has enabled the terrorists to communicate with ease, facilitate flow of funds to each other, access common sources of terrorist hardware and draw upon human resources from a wide catchments area. In this scenario, state specific threat assessment or response strategy has become difficult. Geographic boundaries are part of the problem and not solution;
- Even where institutionalised linkages do not exist, perception of common enemy and ideological commonality reinforces group psychology which binds them in a common bond to think globally even when acting locally. There are various nuanced inter-linkages which are difficult to define but dangerous to ignore. There are very few experts today who can claim full knowledge of all the groups operating, their inter relationship and areas of cooperation. A terrorist of any area is a potential threat to any other part of the world.
Despite these limitations, as different regions have their own peculiarities, their own set of functional terrorist groups, have differing response systems etc, a geographical analysis becomes necessary.
Salafi Terrorism-The Eminent Threat
Most of the Islamic terrorism that the world is experiencing today-
in the West, Arab countries, South Asia or South East Asia- is the
Salafi variety of Jehad. Salafism represents a Sunni Islamic School of
thought that is credited to an eighteenth century ideologue of Saudi
Arabia named Muhammad Ibn Abd-al-Wahhab. It was later refined and
perfected by Scholars of al-Azhar University in Egypt, notable among
them being Muhammad Abduh Jamal-al-Din-al-Afghani and Rashid Rida.
Salafis insist on reverting to the conduct followed by pious ancestors
(Salaf) of the early period of Islam. They believe Islam was perfect and
flawless during the days of Prophet Muhammad but undesirable
innovations and impurities crept over the period of time. They all had
to be identified and discarded. The School is thus opposed to any change
and innovations and highly inflexible and orthodox in its approach.
Though its original home was Middle East and it largely remained
confined there for many decades. Of late, its spatial growth in Sunni
dominated areas all around the world has been notable. For rootless
immigrants and disaffected second-generation youth in Europe, the
attraction of the authentic Salafism as a way to differentiate from
others-as it is seen to be pure and stripped of the local superstitions,
conferring a status of moral superiority.21 One of the main political
objectives of the Salafis is establishment of Islamic caliphate which
could establish the sovereignty of Allah. The concept of caliphate is
totally rejected by the Shias-Shia ideologues have their own
interpretations of ideal Islamic world order, which create a different
variety of radicalism and poses a different genre of conflicts with its
own implications. The present day threat predominantly emanates from
Sunni-extremism. Sunnis constitute over 80% of the world Muslim
population, have widely dispersed global spread and exclusively
contribute to the Salafi ranks, who believe in Islamic universality,
allowing no local diversions.
Sunni revivalists of the caliphate idea include Hizb-ut-Tahir, a
major radical Pan Islamic outfit which has its presence in over 45
countries. In Central Asia they stand for establishment of an Islamic
state from Black sea to Xinziang in China. Similarly, an idea of a
united Islamic state in South East Asia comprising of Indonesia,
Malaysia, Southern Thailand, Parts of Philippines and other adjoining
areas is envisaged. Similar vision is harbored for South Asian countries
and many other parts of the world. All these new gains, through Jehad,
integrated with Islamic world are envisaged to be part of the Islamic
caliphate. It may be mentioned that during prophet Mohammad’s time,
Arabia had no state and the Quran does not speak of any Islamic state as
such. The notion of caliphate is of much later origin and came into
existence only after the death of Prophet Mohammed. Salafis stretch the
concept of Islamic Umma to mean a united Islamic Sovereign political
entity rather than unity of Islamic people that it meant. Political
consolidation, they consider is necessary for enforcing the divine laws
of Quran the examples of Prophet (Shria), Islamic laws (fiqh) etc. Their
conflict with notions of modernity likes democracy, Secularism,
equality before law, human rights etc, is fundamental and
irreconcilable. They consider that egalitarianism of Islam provides
sufficient space to meet all human needs – both physical and spiritual.
The spread of Salafi philosophy has given a quantum jump to Islamic
radicalism and concomitant terrorism. It has provided a new breed of
radicals and foot soldiers for Jehad with a fire power and geographical
expanse never known to any religion, including Islam, in history. The
role of ideology in Salafi-Jehadi terror is multi-functional and
intertwined to social and political processes. For a Salafi Jehadi the
strategic objective is not only creating liberated Shari’a zones but
perpetration of Jehad itself and attainment of martyrdom. The ideology
both expresses and reinforces a culture of self martyrdom as a strategic
good in itself giving rise to phenomenon like suicide terrorism.
Salafis consider themselves as Al Taifa-al Mansoura (the victorious
group) who alone would be saved at the end of time. They are critical of
moderate Salafis who only believe in it ideologically but are unwilling
to participate in Jehad, and label them as Margi’eb (prevaricators).
This fraternity reaches its apogee in combat and revolves around the
common pursuit of martyrdom.16 The promise of brotherhood and its
associated group is essential component of the recruitment process,
especially for Jehadis in the West.17 In its most extreme form, Salafi
“parallelism” can be found in the concept of ‘takfiri’, separation from
all elements of society outside their cells. In this concept exclusion
both of Muslims and non-Muslims is legitimate and not apostate. This
permits the targeting of everyone outside the group, Muslims and
non-Muslims for violence.18 The Salafi terrorist ideology creates an
obligation for physical Jehad as Bin Laden wrote “the most important
religious duty –after belief itself- is to ward off and fight the enemy.
Jehad is obligatory now for the Islamic nation, which is in a state of
sin unless it gives its sons to maintain Jehad.19
Spatial Growth And Expanse
The above dialectic of Islamic terrorism renders a geographical
theatre analysis meaningless. For them, the whole world is a single
entity where Nizam-e-Mustafa (the Sovereignty of Allah) has to be
established. Briefly, a geographical analysis has to be understood
factoring in the following constraining factors:
- At ideological plane, the Jehadis consider the areas, where the
sovereignty of Allah does not exist as Dar-ul-Harb. Here wars have to be
fought to convert or kill to establish Islam. In the Islamic regimes,
wars have to be fought to enforce the laws laid down by Quran, Shari’a,
etc. This practically extends their arch of action to the entire world.
- Emergence of International Islamic Front for Jehad under the
over-arching leadership of Osama Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda has brought
in ideological unity and global networking among Islamic extremist of
various hues. The call of global Jehad cutting across nationalities,
ethnicity, language culture etc., renders boundaries of nation states
meaning- less. It has converted Al Qaeda from a terrorist outfit to an
Islamic movement with no formal structure and centralized control but as
a global motivator for terror and violence;
- Modern technology and revolution in informatics has enabled the
terrorists to communicate with ease, facilitate flow of funds to each
other, access common sources of terrorist hardware and draw upon human
resources from a wide catchments area. In this scenario, state specific
threat assessment or response strategy has become difficult. Geographic
boundaries are part of the problem and not solution;
- Even where institutionalised linkages do not exist, perception of
common enemy and ideological commonality reinforces group psychology
which binds them in a common bond to think globally even when acting
locally. There are various nuanced inter-linkages which are difficult to
define but dangerous to ignore. There are very few experts today who
can claim full knowledge of all the groups operating, their inter
relationship and areas of cooperation. A terrorist of any area is a
potential threat to any other part of the world.
Despite these limitations, as different regions have their own
peculiarities, their own set of functional terrorist groups, have
differing response systems etc, a geographical analysis becomes
necessary.
- See more at: http://www.vifindia.org/node/269#sthash.AGdUH0j3.dpufSalafi Terrorism-The Eminent Threat
Most of the Islamic terrorism that the world is experiencing today- in the West, Arab countries, South Asia or South East Asia- is the Salafi variety of Jehad. Salafism represents a Sunni Islamic School of thought that is credited to an eighteenth century ideologue of Saudi Arabia named Muhammad Ibn Abd-al-Wahhab. It was later refined and perfected by Scholars of al-Azhar University in Egypt, notable among them being Muhammad Abduh Jamal-al-Din-al-Afghani and Rashid Rida. Salafis insist on reverting to the conduct followed by pious ancestors (Salaf) of the early period of Islam. They believe Islam was perfect and flawless during the days of Prophet Muhammad but undesirable innovations and impurities crept over the period of time. They all had to be identified and discarded. The School is thus opposed to any change and innovations and highly inflexible and orthodox in its approach.
Though its original home was Middle East and it largely remained confined there for many decades. Of late, its spatial growth in Sunni dominated areas all around the world has been notable. For rootless immigrants and disaffected second-generation youth in Europe, the attraction of the authentic Salafism as a way to differentiate from others-as it is seen to be pure and stripped of the local superstitions, conferring a status of moral superiority.21 One of the main political objectives of the Salafis is establishment of Islamic caliphate which could establish the sovereignty of Allah. The concept of caliphate is totally rejected by the Shias-Shia ideologues have their own interpretations of ideal Islamic world order, which create a different variety of radicalism and poses a different genre of conflicts with its own implications. The present day threat predominantly emanates from Sunni-extremism. Sunnis constitute over 80% of the world Muslim population, have widely dispersed global spread and exclusively contribute to the Salafi ranks, who believe in Islamic universality, allowing no local diversions.
Sunni revivalists of the caliphate idea include Hizb-ut-Tahir, a major radical Pan Islamic outfit which has its presence in over 45 countries. In Central Asia they stand for establishment of an Islamic state from Black sea to Xinziang in China. Similarly, an idea of a united Islamic state in South East Asia comprising of Indonesia, Malaysia, Southern Thailand, Parts of Philippines and other adjoining areas is envisaged. Similar vision is harbored for South Asian countries and many other parts of the world. All these new gains, through Jehad, integrated with Islamic world are envisaged to be part of the Islamic caliphate. It may be mentioned that during prophet Mohammad’s time, Arabia had no state and the Quran does not speak of any Islamic state as such. The notion of caliphate is of much later origin and came into existence only after the death of Prophet Mohammed. Salafis stretch the concept of Islamic Umma to mean a united Islamic Sovereign political entity rather than unity of Islamic people that it meant. Political consolidation, they consider is necessary for enforcing the divine laws of Quran the examples of Prophet (Shria), Islamic laws (fiqh) etc. Their conflict with notions of modernity likes democracy, Secularism, equality before law, human rights etc, is fundamental and irreconcilable. They consider that egalitarianism of Islam provides sufficient space to meet all human needs – both physical and spiritual.
The spread of Salafi philosophy has given a quantum jump to Islamic radicalism and concomitant terrorism. It has provided a new breed of radicals and foot soldiers for Jehad with a fire power and geographical expanse never known to any religion, including Islam, in history. The role of ideology in Salafi-Jehadi terror is multi-functional and intertwined to social and political processes. For a Salafi Jehadi the strategic objective is not only creating liberated Shari’a zones but perpetration of Jehad itself and attainment of martyrdom. The ideology both expresses and reinforces a culture of self martyrdom as a strategic good in itself giving rise to phenomenon like suicide terrorism. Salafis consider themselves as Al Taifa-al Mansoura (the victorious group) who alone would be saved at the end of time. They are critical of moderate Salafis who only believe in it ideologically but are unwilling to participate in Jehad, and label them as Margi’eb (prevaricators). This fraternity reaches its apogee in combat and revolves around the common pursuit of martyrdom.16 The promise of brotherhood and its associated group is essential component of the recruitment process, especially for Jehadis in the West.17 In its most extreme form, Salafi “parallelism” can be found in the concept of ‘takfiri’, separation from all elements of society outside their cells. In this concept exclusion both of Muslims and non-Muslims is legitimate and not apostate. This permits the targeting of everyone outside the group, Muslims and non-Muslims for violence.18 The Salafi terrorist ideology creates an obligation for physical Jehad as Bin Laden wrote “the most important religious duty –after belief itself- is to ward off and fight the enemy. Jehad is obligatory now for the Islamic nation, which is in a state of sin unless it gives its sons to maintain Jehad.19
Spatial Growth And Expanse
The above dialectic of Islamic terrorism renders a geographical theatre analysis meaningless. For them, the whole world is a single entity where Nizam-e-Mustafa (the Sovereignty of Allah) has to be established. Briefly, a geographical analysis has to be understood factoring in the following constraining factors:
At ideological plane, the Jehadis consider the areas, where the sovereignty of Allah does not exist as Dar-ul-Harb. Here wars have to be fought to convert or kill to establish Islam. In the Islamic regimes, wars have to be fought to enforce the laws laid down by Quran, Shari’a, etc. This practically extends their arch of action to the entire world.
Emergence of International Islamic Front for Jehad under the over-arching leadership of Osama Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda has brought in ideological unity and global networking among Islamic extremist of various hues. The call of global Jehad cutting across nationalities, ethnicity, language culture etc., renders boundaries of nation states meaning- less. It has converted Al Qaeda from a terrorist outfit to an Islamic movement with no formal structure and centralized control but as a global motivator for terror and violence;
Modern technology and revolution in informatics has enabled the terrorists to communicate with ease, facilitate flow of funds to each other, access common sources of terrorist hardware and draw upon human resources from a wide catchments area. In this scenario, state specific threat assessment or response strategy has become difficult. Geographic boundaries are part of the problem and not solution;
Even where institutionalised linkages do not exist, perception of common enemy and ideological commonality reinforces group psychology which binds them in a common bond to think globally even when acting locally. There are various nuanced inter-linkages which are difficult to define but dangerous to ignore. There are very few experts today who can claim full knowledge of all the groups operating, their inter relationship and areas of cooperation. A terrorist of any area is a potential threat to any other part of the world.
Despite these limitations, as different regions have their own peculiarities, their own set of functional terrorist groups, have differing response systems etc, a geographical analysis becomes necessary.
Salafi Terrorism-The Eminent Threat
Most of the Islamic terrorism that the world is experiencing today-
in the West, Arab countries, South Asia or South East Asia- is the
Salafi variety of Jehad. Salafism represents a Sunni Islamic School of
thought that is credited to an eighteenth century ideologue of Saudi
Arabia named Muhammad Ibn Abd-al-Wahhab. It was later refined and
perfected by Scholars of al-Azhar University in Egypt, notable among
them being Muhammad Abduh Jamal-al-Din-al-Afghani and Rashid Rida.
Salafis insist on reverting to the conduct followed by pious ancestors
(Salaf) of the early period of Islam. They believe Islam was perfect and
flawless during the days of Prophet Muhammad but undesirable
innovations and impurities crept over the period of time. They all had
to be identified and discarded. The School is thus opposed to any change
and innovations and highly inflexible and orthodox in its approach.
Though its original home was Middle East and it largely remained
confined there for many decades. Of late, its spatial growth in Sunni
dominated areas all around the world has been notable. For rootless
immigrants and disaffected second-generation youth in Europe, the
attraction of the authentic Salafism as a way to differentiate from
others-as it is seen to be pure and stripped of the local superstitions,
conferring a status of moral superiority.21 One of the main political
objectives of the Salafis is establishment of Islamic caliphate which
could establish the sovereignty of Allah. The concept of caliphate is
totally rejected by the Shias-Shia ideologues have their own
interpretations of ideal Islamic world order, which create a different
variety of radicalism and poses a different genre of conflicts with its
own implications. The present day threat predominantly emanates from
Sunni-extremism. Sunnis constitute over 80% of the world Muslim
population, have widely dispersed global spread and exclusively
contribute to the Salafi ranks, who believe in Islamic universality,
allowing no local diversions.
Sunni revivalists of the caliphate idea include Hizb-ut-Tahir, a
major radical Pan Islamic outfit which has its presence in over 45
countries. In Central Asia they stand for establishment of an Islamic
state from Black sea to Xinziang in China. Similarly, an idea of a
united Islamic state in South East Asia comprising of Indonesia,
Malaysia, Southern Thailand, Parts of Philippines and other adjoining
areas is envisaged. Similar vision is harbored for South Asian countries
and many other parts of the world. All these new gains, through Jehad,
integrated with Islamic world are envisaged to be part of the Islamic
caliphate. It may be mentioned that during prophet Mohammad’s time,
Arabia had no state and the Quran does not speak of any Islamic state as
such. The notion of caliphate is of much later origin and came into
existence only after the death of Prophet Mohammed. Salafis stretch the
concept of Islamic Umma to mean a united Islamic Sovereign political
entity rather than unity of Islamic people that it meant. Political
consolidation, they consider is necessary for enforcing the divine laws
of Quran the examples of Prophet (Shria), Islamic laws (fiqh) etc. Their
conflict with notions of modernity likes democracy, Secularism,
equality before law, human rights etc, is fundamental and
irreconcilable. They consider that egalitarianism of Islam provides
sufficient space to meet all human needs – both physical and spiritual.
The spread of Salafi philosophy has given a quantum jump to Islamic
radicalism and concomitant terrorism. It has provided a new breed of
radicals and foot soldiers for Jehad with a fire power and geographical
expanse never known to any religion, including Islam, in history. The
role of ideology in Salafi-Jehadi terror is multi-functional and
intertwined to social and political processes. For a Salafi Jehadi the
strategic objective is not only creating liberated Shari’a zones but
perpetration of Jehad itself and attainment of martyrdom. The ideology
both expresses and reinforces a culture of self martyrdom as a strategic
good in itself giving rise to phenomenon like suicide terrorism.
Salafis consider themselves as Al Taifa-al Mansoura (the victorious
group) who alone would be saved at the end of time. They are critical of
moderate Salafis who only believe in it ideologically but are unwilling
to participate in Jehad, and label them as Margi’eb (prevaricators).
This fraternity reaches its apogee in combat and revolves around the
common pursuit of martyrdom.16 The promise of brotherhood and its
associated group is essential component of the recruitment process,
especially for Jehadis in the West.17 In its most extreme form, Salafi
“parallelism” can be found in the concept of ‘takfiri’, separation from
all elements of society outside their cells. In this concept exclusion
both of Muslims and non-Muslims is legitimate and not apostate. This
permits the targeting of everyone outside the group, Muslims and
non-Muslims for violence.18 The Salafi terrorist ideology creates an
obligation for physical Jehad as Bin Laden wrote “the most important
religious duty –after belief itself- is to ward off and fight the enemy.
Jehad is obligatory now for the Islamic nation, which is in a state of
sin unless it gives its sons to maintain Jehad.19
Spatial Growth And Expanse
The above dialectic of Islamic terrorism renders a geographical
theatre analysis meaningless. For them, the whole world is a single
entity where Nizam-e-Mustafa (the Sovereignty of Allah) has to be
established. Briefly, a geographical analysis has to be understood
factoring in the following constraining factors:
- At ideological plane, the Jehadis consider the areas, where the
sovereignty of Allah does not exist as Dar-ul-Harb. Here wars have to be
fought to convert or kill to establish Islam. In the Islamic regimes,
wars have to be fought to enforce the laws laid down by Quran, Shari’a,
etc. This practically extends their arch of action to the entire world.
- Emergence of International Islamic Front for Jehad under the
over-arching leadership of Osama Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda has brought
in ideological unity and global networking among Islamic extremist of
various hues. The call of global Jehad cutting across nationalities,
ethnicity, language culture etc., renders boundaries of nation states
meaning- less. It has converted Al Qaeda from a terrorist outfit to an
Islamic movement with no formal structure and centralized control but as
a global motivator for terror and violence;
- Modern technology and revolution in informatics has enabled the
terrorists to communicate with ease, facilitate flow of funds to each
other, access common sources of terrorist hardware and draw upon human
resources from a wide catchments area. In this scenario, state specific
threat assessment or response strategy has become difficult. Geographic
boundaries are part of the problem and not solution;
- Even where institutionalised linkages do not exist, perception of
common enemy and ideological commonality reinforces group psychology
which binds them in a common bond to think globally even when acting
locally. There are various nuanced inter-linkages which are difficult to
define but dangerous to ignore. There are very few experts today who
can claim full knowledge of all the groups operating, their inter
relationship and areas of cooperation. A terrorist of any area is a
potential threat to any other part of the world.
Despite these limitations, as different regions have their own
peculiarities, their own set of functional terrorist groups, have
differing response systems etc, a geographical analysis becomes
necessary.
- See more at: http://www.vifindia.org/node/269#sthash.AGdUH0j3.dpuf
Salafi Terrorism-The Eminent Threat
Most of the Islamic terrorism that the world is experiencing today-
in the West, Arab countries, South Asia or South East Asia- is the
Salafi variety of Jehad. Salafism represents a Sunni Islamic School of
thought that is credited to an eighteenth century ideologue of Saudi
Arabia named Muhammad Ibn Abd-al-Wahhab. It was later refined and
perfected by Scholars of al-Azhar University in Egypt, notable among
them being Muhammad Abduh Jamal-al-Din-al-Afghani and Rashid Rida.
Salafis insist on reverting to the conduct followed by pious ancestors
(Salaf) of the early period of Islam. They believe Islam was perfect and
flawless during the days of Prophet Muhammad but undesirable
innovations and impurities crept over the period of time. They all had
to be identified and discarded. The School is thus opposed to any change
and innovations and highly inflexible and orthodox in its approach.
Though its original home was Middle East and it largely remained
confined there for many decades. Of late, its spatial growth in Sunni
dominated areas all around the world has been notable. For rootless
immigrants and disaffected second-generation youth in Europe, the
attraction of the authentic Salafism as a way to differentiate from
others-as it is seen to be pure and stripped of the local superstitions,
conferring a status of moral superiority.21 One of the main political
objectives of the Salafis is establishment of Islamic caliphate which
could establish the sovereignty of Allah. The concept of caliphate is
totally rejected by the Shias-Shia ideologues have their own
interpretations of ideal Islamic world order, which create a different
variety of radicalism and poses a different genre of conflicts with its
own implications. The present day threat predominantly emanates from
Sunni-extremism. Sunnis constitute over 80% of the world Muslim
population, have widely dispersed global spread and exclusively
contribute to the Salafi ranks, who believe in Islamic universality,
allowing no local diversions.
Sunni revivalists of the caliphate idea include Hizb-ut-Tahir, a
major radical Pan Islamic outfit which has its presence in over 45
countries. In Central Asia they stand for establishment of an Islamic
state from Black sea to Xinziang in China. Similarly, an idea of a
united Islamic state in South East Asia comprising of Indonesia,
Malaysia, Southern Thailand, Parts of Philippines and other adjoining
areas is envisaged. Similar vision is harbored for South Asian countries
and many other parts of the world. All these new gains, through Jehad,
integrated with Islamic world are envisaged to be part of the Islamic
caliphate. It may be mentioned that during prophet Mohammad’s time,
Arabia had no state and the Quran does not speak of any Islamic state as
such. The notion of caliphate is of much later origin and came into
existence only after the death of Prophet Mohammed. Salafis stretch the
concept of Islamic Umma to mean a united Islamic Sovereign political
entity rather than unity of Islamic people that it meant. Political
consolidation, they consider is necessary for enforcing the divine laws
of Quran the examples of Prophet (Shria), Islamic laws (fiqh) etc. Their
conflict with notions of modernity likes democracy, Secularism,
equality before law, human rights etc, is fundamental and
irreconcilable. They consider that egalitarianism of Islam provides
sufficient space to meet all human needs – both physical and spiritual.
The spread of Salafi philosophy has given a quantum jump to Islamic
radicalism and concomitant terrorism. It has provided a new breed of
radicals and foot soldiers for Jehad with a fire power and geographical
expanse never known to any religion, including Islam, in history. The
role of ideology in Salafi-Jehadi terror is multi-functional and
intertwined to social and political processes. For a Salafi Jehadi the
strategic objective is not only creating liberated Shari’a zones but
perpetration of Jehad itself and attainment of martyrdom. The ideology
both expresses and reinforces a culture of self martyrdom as a strategic
good in itself giving rise to phenomenon like suicide terrorism.
Salafis consider themselves as Al Taifa-al Mansoura (the victorious
group) who alone would be saved at the end of time. They are critical of
moderate Salafis who only believe in it ideologically but are unwilling
to participate in Jehad, and label them as Margi’eb (prevaricators).
This fraternity reaches its apogee in combat and revolves around the
common pursuit of martyrdom.16 The promise of brotherhood and its
associated group is essential component of the recruitment process,
especially for Jehadis in the West.17 In its most extreme form, Salafi
“parallelism” can be found in the concept of ‘takfiri’, separation from
all elements of society outside their cells. In this concept exclusion
both of Muslims and non-Muslims is legitimate and not apostate. This
permits the targeting of everyone outside the group, Muslims and
non-Muslims for violence.18 The Salafi terrorist ideology creates an
obligation for physical Jehad as Bin Laden wrote “the most important
religious duty –after belief itself- is to ward off and fight the enemy.
Jehad is obligatory now for the Islamic nation, which is in a state of
sin unless it gives its sons to maintain Jehad.19
Spatial Growth And Expanse
The above dialectic of Islamic terrorism renders a geographical
theatre analysis meaningless. For them, the whole world is a single
entity where Nizam-e-Mustafa (the Sovereignty of Allah) has to be
established. Briefly, a geographical analysis has to be understood
factoring in the following constraining factors:
- At ideological plane, the Jehadis consider the areas, where the
sovereignty of Allah does not exist as Dar-ul-Harb. Here wars have to be
fought to convert or kill to establish Islam. In the Islamic regimes,
wars have to be fought to enforce the laws laid down by Quran, Shari’a,
etc. This practically extends their arch of action to the entire world.
- Emergence of International Islamic Front for Jehad under the
over-arching leadership of Osama Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda has brought
in ideological unity and global networking among Islamic extremist of
various hues. The call of global Jehad cutting across nationalities,
ethnicity, language culture etc., renders boundaries of nation states
meaning- less. It has converted Al Qaeda from a terrorist outfit to an
Islamic movement with no formal structure and centralized control but as
a global motivator for terror and violence;
- Modern technology and revolution in informatics has enabled the
terrorists to communicate with ease, facilitate flow of funds to each
other, access common sources of terrorist hardware and draw upon human
resources from a wide catchments area. In this scenario, state specific
threat assessment or response strategy has become difficult. Geographic
boundaries are part of the problem and not solution;
- Even where institutionalised linkages do not exist, perception of
common enemy and ideological commonality reinforces group psychology
which binds them in a common bond to think globally even when acting
locally. There are various nuanced inter-linkages which are difficult to
define but dangerous to ignore. There are very few experts today who
can claim full knowledge of all the groups operating, their inter
relationship and areas of cooperation. A terrorist of any area is a
potential threat to any other part of the world.
Despite these limitations, as different regions have their own
peculiarities, their own set of functional terrorist groups, have
differing response systems etc, a geographical analysis becomes
necessary.
- See more at: http://www.vifindia.org/node/269#sthash.AGdUH0j3.dpuf